A bitter High Court dispute has broken out involving potential neighbours over the construction of a wall in a coastal site within a north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted national awareness following an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed loved ones property at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of organizing breaches, environmental problems, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Moments short article about René Collier as well as Irish Times write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a local disagreement has developed into a extremely publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than building operates at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and an organization director respectively, seek out to create their loved ones residence. The case is now emblematic of wider disputes together Eire’s coastline, the place growth pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of set up residents. In accordance with the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being made by their prospective neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted underneath organizing permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally citizens of Dublin Highway, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their setting up permission by building a wall over and above the boundaries in their website, bringing about an encroachment with a Distinctive Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as a result areas are matter to stringent controls below European and Irish environmental legislation. In their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments could have Long lasting ecological implications, particularly inside of a sensitive coastal environment for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach of their organizing permission, and say the wall, and that is partly built, is in the correct posture. Their lawful staff has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful improvement. The couple accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding so that you can protect their perspective, an allegation which has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal organizing disputes, in which views of the sea are both equally extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described spectacular endeavours via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the website, In accordance with sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-substantial drinking water through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances, a picture which has because become emblematic of your intensity from the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they have been intended to Get Visible evidence of your wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Moments noted, describing how The 2 Males entered the drinking water throughout intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm h2o to photograph the website grew to become Probably the most striking descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Occasions posting about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these actions ended up cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was staying encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been protected intimately via the national push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as viewers sought to understand the background and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read further more submissions on regardless of whether interim orders must be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial moment within the legal timeline.
At the Main of your dispute is usually a disagreement around boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain the wall, as made, goes past what was authorized and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm water to photograph the site accountant by occupation, is described as meticulous in his evaluation of organizing documents, maps, and disorders connected towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their action is motivated by worry for environmental protection and adherence to scheduling legislation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A personal check out, insisting instead that it's about ensuring that growth at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they have described their extensive-standing connection to the world and their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a few merely seeking to create a spouse and children house in accordance While using the law. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Exclusive Region of Conservation and say that each one will work have been carried out determined by Experienced guidance and accepted options. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including entering the sea throughout a storm, usually do not change the underlying information.
The case has also raised broader questions on how planning disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around design of wall at coastal web page happens to be a shorthand description for a situation that many observers see as increasingly common. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become much more contentious.
The Irish Occasions article about René Collier pointed out the businessman had Beforehand been associated with nearby advocacy on planning and environmental difficulties, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from pretty diverse Expert backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous While using the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location with the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-higher drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations and René Collier waded by means of midsection-high water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the physical actuality on the coastline as well as symbolic mother nature from the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an abnormal solution.
As the High Court proceedings carry on, the outcome remains uncertain. The court must figure out whether the wall as constructed complies with preparing permission and whether or not any encroachment into a Unique Region of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and scheduling ailments. Still the human factor remains central: neighbours who must Are living along with each other long once the authorized expenses have been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction is effective at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the case increase outside of that address. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. Additionally, it underscores how immediately a local disagreement can escalate when elementary problems for instance environmental protection and residence legal rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a spot of pure elegance and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre from the dispute stands partially designed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal queries. Irrespective of whether it's going to in the long run be altered, eradicated, or finished as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s conclusions. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to One of the more intently viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin recently.